This week we went to the Web Summit in Dublin which attracted 22,000 attendees from around the world. Investors, startups, and media from the big tech companies like Google and Dropbox to venture capital firms like Greylock, NEA and Sequoia were all well represented. It was a truly impressive event and my first time attending.
We met some amazing people and investors. The Summit really made me feel encouraged about our prospects for the future and feel we have an amazing product, idea and team. Carly was running around the whole time, accosting investors and media alike, and I admit I did my fair share. But we got a lot of great exposure and a lot of interest. We met with investors from the Middle East, Europe and the States and met incredible startups from around the world. It was a truly global tech summit and very exciting to see what some companies are doing.
I have attended South by Southwest (SXSW) many times at interactive as well as the music and film elements. The last time I attended South by was as an investor and before that as a tech/music/culture enthusiast. At the Web Summit, I attended as a co-founder of a startup, so certainly that changed the way I saw the conference and what I expected to get out of it. I saw many similarities and differences between the two conferences so I thought I would share a few of the highlights:
1. Segmentation
Each attendee at the Web Summit was assigned a different attendance segment and was given different color coding for their badge. Media was dark green, investors red, ALPHA startups pink, BETA startups bluish-green, etc. There were also events organized solely for each type of attendee and other types were not allowed to join in those events. Some workshops, talks and night events were planned specifically by segment and as such meant that there was less chance for an early-stage startup to meet a later stage or an investor who is interested in their space. One attendee who is an accomplished entrepreneur, angel investor and mentor at a major accelerator told me he fits into almost every space so he picked “other” and got a yellow general attendee badge. As a result he was not allowed to visit many different events he was interested in because he did not fit the right category. That means less chance for the serendipitous meetings and less chance of learning from people at the various elements of the tech ecosystem.
Furthermore, because it was so easy to recognize media or investors, it was quite often an invitation for desperate startups to accost the attendees. One investor called his badge a “target” and most took them off as soon as possible or tucked them inside their shirts. Almost every encounter was structured around the idea that one person was a “media” and the other a “startup”, or any other combination, oftentimes leading to a forced and stilted conversation on that basis. At SXSW the structure is more about ideas and themes. You can attend a panel on social innovation and Africa and sit next to an entrepreneur from Nairobi or a journalist from the NYTimes interested in that space, making it much more likely to find people valuable for you to talk to than grouping by your role in the machine.
2. Pitches and Exhibiting
One of the strengths of the Web Summit was its emphasis on startups. Hundreds, if not thousands, were there and as a startup attendee, I felt that there was a lot of value given to us. The Pitch Competition stages were front and center, and were always well attended by investors, media and other startups. It was always standing-room only at the pitches. At SXSW, pitch competitions are in side rooms and are also well-attended, but not given the same central role in the event. SXSW Interactive is more about thought leadership and innovation on an abstract level, featuring top tech leaders of the world to come and talk about privacy in the internet age or the future of space travel. This has strengths as seen in point 1, but has drawbacks. Startups are innovative but have not established themselves yet, thus they are not given the space to talk at the panels and as such are given secondary importance. The pitch competition at the Summit actually culminated with the startup finalists pitching on the main stage.
3. Parties
SXSW and Web Summit both held their own in the party category. There were many sponsored parties at the Summit from PayPal to Salesforce and even the IDA hosted Bono as a speaker at its’ Wednesday night event. SXSW has an overwhelming amount of parties from hundreds of companies, from Ford to Facebook, and give away ridiculous amounts of swag and free stuff. There were fewer events at the Summit, but that’s not necessarily the worst thing. You can’t be in ten places at once so I’d say that was actually a positive. That meant that the official Web Summit events, “Night Summit”, were actually better attended than the official events at SXSW which essentially were attended by the people who didn’t get an invite to a better sponsored party.
Web Summit is smart to know that some of the best networking at these conferences is done at night over a Guinness and they took the time to make sure that some space and time was given to spontaneous networking. However, the segmentation happened again and there were investor-only parties, BETA startup parties, etc. I was with a group of investors who tried to attend a BETA party they were actually turned away. It was funny, but at the same time it doesn’t make a lot of sense.
4. Music, Food and Film
SXSW has a clear lead on the music and film. It is more established and has hundreds of events with the top acts in the world. I did not attend the Web Summit’s music and film events, but there were also not many to choose from. I am not sure what direction the film and music elements of the Web Summit will take as it is so centrally focused on tech, but it could be interesting. Essentially if you are going for only music or film, skip the Web Summit and go straight to South By. The “Food Summit” at the Web Summit was great, though. They provided free lunch for all three days and it was very tasty traditional Irish food prepared by some of the leading chefs. However it was pretty far from the rest of the events and I only made it to two of the days.
5. Dublin vs. Austin
Both cities are really fantastic and share a lot in common. Both are college towns and have a seat of government there. Both have great bars, chill people and amazing food. The best places I went in Dublin this week included Pichet, the Port House and Dame Street (an actual street). The RDS conference center in Dublin was southwest of the city center as opposed to being in the heart of it like the conference center in Austin which is a drawback. We were trapped out there and it was very hard to find transport sometimes back into the city center. At the same time, trying to find a cab in Austin during SXSW is a lot like the Hunger Games, so I can’t say one wins out here.
–
SXSW is the largest tech conference in the world, had over 30,000 attendees in 2013 and attracts the largest companies and top leaders in the world. SXSW has also been around since 1987 versus 2010 for the Web Summit. Growing from 400 attendees in 2010 to 22,000 this year, there are still a few kinks for the organizers to work out but overall it was a great event as has definitely put Dublin on the tech map. I can easily see it transforming Dublin the way SXSW has transformed Austin. Another exciting development is that the first Irish consulate to be opened in 80 years will now be in Austin. There will most likely be some SXSW-Web Summit cross pollination as well as Dublin-Austin. I will be going to both SXSW and Web Summit next year. Both are great events and well worth the trip.